Saturday, October 4, 2014

Triangle Man

Last night, I went to the Jack Singer Concert Hall to hear Jan Lisiecki, the Calgary-born nineteen year old international pianist sensation, play the Schumann Piano Concerto with the Calgary Philharmonic Orchestra.

It was a very good concert. The Calgary Philharmonic has improved tremendously over the years, and Lisiecki is a very good pianist. Maybe not as fantastic as some claim, but very talented, with brilliant technique and an impressive shock of blond hair that moves around entertainingly as he plays.

The best part of the concert for me though was the orchestra's rendering of the Dvorak New World Symphony, which I thought was outstanding. I was sitting in the left mezzanine, which is basically right next to the orchestra, and you could hear and see the different sections, strings, woodwind, brass, percussion, as they played their parts, echoing each other in various ways, each with its own voice and of course timbre. This interplay, which seemed clearer here than on recordings, was beautifully done and I thought the whole piece was exquisitely played.

The musician closest to me was in the percussion section. At the beginning of the Dvorak symphony, not having any notes to play yet, he sat on a chair and rested his right arm on a stool next to him. Probably in his sixties, balding and rotund, he was dressed like the other men, in tails and a white bow tie, but his shirt was pushed out in front by his belly, and he wore the same expression of resigned boredom as the ex-alderman for Ward 1, where we live, Dale Hodges, the sourpuss of the Calgary City Council. I imagined he might also be a little jealous of the timpani player, a younger man, balding too, but less so, who had many more notes to play on the four big beautiful copper timpani which lay directly in the gaze of his older colleague. The older colleague himself had just two cymbals and a little snare drum, as well as a music stand with what looked like a single sheet of music.

I watched this older percussionist from time to time during the Dvorak, a little surprised he had nothing at all to do. He scratched his ear occasionally, and rubbed his nose, but otherwise, he just sat there, staring ahead at his colleague, who was leaping around, banging his timpani with white pompom drumsticks and all the enthusiasm of youth. During the second movement of the symphony, the older man stood up, and I thought he was going to participate, but it was just to move from the chair to the stool, which he now sat on with the same resigned look as before.

It was not until the third movement that he moved forward and picked up a small metal triangle which had been hidden from me by the cymbals. I thought he was going to play it, but he sat down on the stool again, resting the triangle against his tummy. Then he got up again, at the end of the third movement, moved forward close to the snare drum and picked up a little metal rod which apparently went with the triangle. He held the triangle up in his left hand now, and the rod in his right. I was on the edge of my seat. Then, as the final movement started, he moved the triangle away from himself, and his belly, inserted the rod inside, and rattled it furiously for a few seconds. Then he sat down again.

Four times during the exciting last movement he got up and played the triangle, not furiously like the first time, but in what seemed a gentle, almost foppish sort of way, just tapping it lightly three or four times in a row, then standing back. You could hardly hear it above the trombones and French horns, not to mention the timpani, all of which were going at full throttle. I don't remember ever hearing the triangle in recordings I've listened to, except perhaps during that intense beginning of the last movement. Now that I know, I'll listen for it.

Now my percussionist set the triangle down and, lordy me! picked up the cymbals. We were still only half way through the last movement, and I was sure he was getting ready to contribute to some splendid crescendo. But no. Holding the left cymbal facing upwards and resting about a quarter of the right cymbal on top of it, he simply moved the right cymbal down and off, once, making a gentle swooshing sound and that was it. He waited a few seconds after this contribution, then carefully set the cymbals back in their stand and went to sit down again. Where he stayed until the end. No more triangle, no more cymbals, no snare drum at all. He didn't contribute anything to the amazing finale; he just sat there, looking serious.

I noticed though, as we were all applauding to congratulate the orchestra on its wonderful performance, that, unlike the other musicians, he clapped too, as if he felt at a certain remove, knew that the others had done more than he, and supposed, grudgingly perhaps, that he should publicly thank them for it.

Friday, December 20, 2013

Vivian Maier



Well, I apparently completely missed the media frenzy a couple of years ago about Vivian Maier. Just came across a reference to her on a friend's Facebook page.

Maier was an American street photographer who grew up in France and then spent 40 years working on and off as a nanny in Chicago where she took tens of thousands of photographs with her Rolleiflex camera. El Pais has a small sampling here.

Apparently she never showed anyone her photographs, and didn't even develop a lot of them, but now they have been discovered, after her death, they are attracting critical acclaim. More information, as usual, in Wikipedia.

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Negligible senescence

Negligible senescence, what a wonderful thing! Doesn't have the same ring to it as immortality, but still.

It seems some species hardly age at all, living for hundreds of years or even millennia. "More specifically," says Wikipedia, "negligibly senescent organisms do not have measurable reductions in their reproductive capability with age, or measurable functional decline with age."

So there are clams (the quahogs: there's a word to scrabble with) and turtles and tortoises that live for hundreds of years, and can still have fun copulating (or whatever passes for copulation in a clam) after several centuries. Of course, we don't know if they have as much fun as before.

And then there are jellyfish, and hydra, and aspen trees. Some species of jellyfish are virtually immortal, because of transdifferentiation, it seems. Hydra, which are very small of course, and pretty sessile, just keep on living forever. And although individual aspen can die, the root system keeps pushing up new ones. There's an aspen colony like this in Utah that is 80,000 years old!


Thursday, December 12, 2013

The Decay of American Political Institutions

"The decay of American political institutions" is a troubling and fascinating essay just published on line by Francis Fukuyama (the American historian famous for predicting the "end of history"). Like Lessig's work on "institutional corruption", it is a sad take on the current state of US politics.

Fukuyama sees an imbalance in the American system among the three parts of government: the state (bureaucracy), the legislature and the judiciary. Where other advanced democracies give a large role to the state, the US does the opposite, constraining the state's role to an unusual extent, partly by giving the judiciary an excessive role in the implementation of policy. "Thus, conflicts that in Sweden or Japan would be solved through quiet consultations between interested parties through the bureaucracy are fought out through formal litigation in the American court system." As he points out, the judiciary is a slow, unpredictable, unelected and costly way of settling things.

In addition to this, the explosion of the influence of special interest groups or lobbyists has eroded the ability of the government to function effectively. Noting the astonishing rise in the number of lobbyists, from 175 in 1971 to 13,700 in 2007, Fukuyama has harsh words for the resulting corruption of government: "In this respect, the United States is no different from the Chinese state in the later Han Dynasty, or the Mamluk regime in the century prior to its defeat by the Ottomans, or the French state under the ancien régime."

He notes that many influential thinkers have defended people's right to form voluntary associations, seeing them as "schools for democracy" (Tocqueville). Also, because such groups are necessarily diverse ("interest group pluralism"), the argument goes, they cancel each other out and result in overall public benefit.

I like Fukuyama's take on this:

The primary argument against interest-group pluralism has to do with distorted representation. E.E. Schattschneider, in his seminal 1960 book The Semisovereign People, argued that the actual practice of democracy in America has nothing to do with its popular image as government “of the people, by the people, for the people.” Political outcomes seldom correspond with popular preferences given the very low level of participation and political awareness; real decisions are made by much smaller groups of organized interests. A similar argument is buried in Olson’s framework, since he notes that not all groups are equally capable of organizing for collective action. The interest groups that contend for the attention of Congress are therefore not collectively representative of the whole American people. They are rather representative of the best organized and (what often amounts to the same thing) most richly endowed parts of American society. This bias is not random and almost invariably works against the interests of the unorganized or unorganizable, who are often poor, poorly educated or otherwise marginalized. (emphasis mine)

Fukuyama goes on:

Morris Fiorina has shown that the American “political class” is far more polarized than the American people themselves. Most Americans support moderate or compromise positions on many contentious issues, from abortion to deficits to school prayer to gay marriage, while party activists are invariably more ideological and take more extreme positions, whether on the Left or Right.
Despite the current perception that special interest groups are mainly right-wing and corporatist, many of the most powerful ones have been what we think of as left-wing: just think of the unions and the civil rights movement. So this is not just an ideological problem. In normal circumstances, people with opposing viewpoints talk: their ideas are shaped by dialogue and communication.  But lobbyists don't talk to each other, and neither do legislators: there is little real debate in the House or Senate, just prepared statements and talking points. This leads to what Fukuyama calls a vetocracy:

I mean by vetocracy the process whereby the American system of checks and balances makes collective decision-making based on electoral majorities extremely difficult.
Unlike the Westminster system, with very few actors with a power of veto, in a checks-and-balances system like the American one, there is a proliferation of veto-wielders. As an example, Fukuyama compares the budget process in the two countries: in Britain, the budget is drawn up by the bureaucracy on instructions from the governing party, presented by the party in parliament and voted on in a single vote, yes or no. In the US, the process is so complicated Fukuyama needs two paragraphs to summarize it.

Fukuyama ends his essay with a few suggestions for change, but you can feel that his heart is not in it. His final words are succinct but depressing: "So we have a problem."


Friday, December 6, 2013

Mistakes

The explicit sex movie, Nymphomaniac, includes threesomes, sadomasochism and a penis montage (not sure if this is what I think it is). It recently caused outrage when its trailer was mistakenly shown to an audience of schoolchildren.   
Parents in the auditorium in Tampa, Florida, reportedly struggled to cover the eyes of their offspring, while others headed swiftly for the exits, as an apparent technical error saw the promotional clip for Danish agent provocateur Lars von Trier's salacious new film suddenly hit the big screen.
"They put in the filler, it looked like Steamboat Willie, the old Mickey Mouse cartoon, and then all of a sudden it goes into this other scene," grandmother Lynn Greene told My Fox Tampa Bay. "It seemed like forever when you're trying to, you know, cover a little guy's eyes. I didn't have enough hands to cover his ears too and he got the sound down real good." (The Guardian)

Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Stories of Interest


The Little Village that Could: Fascinating story about a village in Andalucía called Marinaleda which has managed to create a communist-style utopia over the last 50 years is told in a recent book, The Village Against the World, by Don Hancox.

Spain is more corrupt: A recent report by Transparency International has Spain sliding way down the list of corrupt countries, to 40th spot, between Poland and Cap Verde (out of 177 countries ranked). New Zealand and Denmark came joint first. The US ranked 19th and Canada 9th. Comments in The Guardian emphasize the PP's scandals and also the royal troubles of Iñaki Urdangarin, the king's son-in-law. Apparently Spain will now draw up its first Freedom of Information Act, though it has already been criticized as not going far enough.

US Government Cheating on Pensions: An astonishingly hard-hitting essay on Newsweek shows how governments and companies are cheating workers out of their pensions, and being supported by the courts. This is very chilling reading.






Sunday, September 22, 2013

Employment rates


The employment rate of a country is in many ways a better indicator of the state of employment than the unemployment rate. For example, in 2010, the US had an unemployment rate of almost 10%, while the employment rate (for those between 15 and 64) was about 67%, according to the OECD. 

Some other figures (latest unemployment rate - employment rate in 2010):

Switzerland       3.1% and 78.6%
Canada             7.2% and 71.5%
Germany           5.3% and 71.1%
U.K.                 7.7% and 69.5%
U.S                  7.4% and 66.7%
France              11%  and 64%
Mexico              5.1% and 60%
Spain              27.2% and 58.6%
Turkey              8.1% and 46.6%

Unemployment rates are notoriously unreliable because states define them in different ways.

People who choose not to work, or have retired early, or live off their investments, or have just dropped out of the workforce and no longer seek employment, make up most of the difference between the two rates. In the US in 2010, that difference was (100 - (67+10)) = 23%. In Turkey, I wonder how the 45% difference is made up?